9 April 2015One of the problems which those of us who believe that there are things which exist contingently (Contingentists to use Timothy Williamson’s terminology) usually have with the Barcan Formula (=$\Diamond\exists x A \supset \exists x\Diamond A$) is that it somehow entails that everything which exists exists necessarily. Usually this is demonstrated by appealing to the Converse Barcan Formula as well, which by itself already makes trouble for the contingentist. This might lead one to suspect that the Barcan Formula is somehow ‘safe’ so long as it doesn’t bring the Converse Barcan Formula with it.
13 March 2015
One of the great pleasures of doing logic is finding problems in one area which can be solved using the techniques and insights from another. What I want to briefly mention here is a neat example of this involving an interesting approach to quantificational logic due to Veikko Rantala called ‘Urn Logic’. The core idea behind urn logic’s semantics for the quantifiers is that the objects which the quantifiers range over can vary over the course of the evaluation of a formula, depending on which objects are selected from the domain by earlier quantifiers. Veikko’s original semantics for this is in the style of Hintikka’s game theoretic semantics, and I’ve proposed a more standard version of the semantics in my ‘A Sequent Calculus for Urn Logic’. What I’m interested in here, though, is a ‘classical’ semantics for Urn Logic proposed by Max Cresswell, and how a question he asks about the expressivity of this semantics can be answered using a very familiar construction from modal logic.
27 February 2015
Hello! Welcome to this, the website of Rohan French, Australian philosohical logician at large in Europe. I’ve been meaning to put this site together for some time, and was recently inspired by the redesign of Greg Restall’s wonderful consequently.org, and how pleasant (for a tinkerer who briefly worked as a web developer) Hugo was to use.